I then contend that marriage is being used as a weapon against LGBT individuals, and that this is done from within a discourse that elevates marriage to a right that only heterosexual citizens are entitled to. However, as I argue, homosexuality is one way in which individuals are ‘othered’ by Israeli immigration policy, since they cannot acquire legal status based on their marital status. I then compare American and Israeli immigration policies concerning immigrants' sexuality, and discuss the different focuses of each system: while American policy (prior to its reform) was mainly concerned with ‘sexual deviancy’, Israeli policy was concerned with otherness, particularly non-Jewishness, in general. And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house. I begin by introducing the Wandering Gay as a hidden driving cultural concept behind a state's reluctance (and in some places, outright objection) to recognise same-sex relationships. But let none of you suffer as a murderer or a thief or an evildoer or as a. This is an article about this fear of the ‘Wandering Gay’, about the ways in which this fear has influenced domestic and international law regarding recognition in same-sex relationships, and about ways in which it can be overcome. We then found her uniform top horrifyingly, in the toilet, with her uniform bottoms in the feminine trash can next to the toilet.
Another student lent her one and she started class. Fear of that legal subject manifests itself in law and policy not only about ‘the family’ but also about nationhood and citizenship. One of our teenage students came to the front desk to inform us that her uniform was missing. Throughout the history of the modern state, homosexuality has been a legal category, and not simply a medical or a psychiatric one.
0 kommentar(er)
